Bach made an impromptu visit to King Frederick the Great of Prussia, and was . Gödel, Escher, and Bach are deeply intertwined in this very short Dialogue. What are some of the most riveting concepts featured in Gödel, Escher, Bach? Why isn’t the Douglas Hofstadter book Gödel, Escher, Bach available as an. Godel, Escher, Bach by Douglas R. Hofstadter, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide.
|Published (Last):||10 August 2014|
|PDF File Size:||15.82 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.70 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Colonade of St Peter’s Nocturnal Rome: A unique endeavor that, while not always successful in the pursuit of a coherent and convincing elucidation of the author’s theses, represents something of a classic that must be read for its This is quite a remarkable book: Fiction does not simply come out of nowhere.
Hofstadter, and even to you, but to me, there may be bavh entirely different conclusion from the same information. Views Read Edit View history. GEB has the potential to put your beliefs about the nature of consciousness and life on a much sounder, but douhlas challenging intellectual footing, and it’s a great distillation of the ferment but ever increasing levels of profundity experienced in theoretical science since the s – when we found ourselves with power to explain phenomena we were confident we could leave to the spiritual even post – Enlightenment, just as Godel encountered our first?
Also, I have this thing where I fucking hate dialogues. Many years of operating in the stratosphere of mathematics have made the author perhaps a little too playful in his sense of how many meta-levels a book or argument should contain, but he reiterates the thesis from enough angles that you can skip off the surface of a few pages if you find your brain exploding.
I was wondering if you could help me review this book that I am reading. If I had no basis I might have struggled intensely. I hope you like this. You will be required to think about the problems presented, and work to understand and use the complex logical systems that have been created, or you will quickly lose the thread of the argument. But she doesn’t seem heart-broken in the least. I need to hear it explained in another way. Both are worth reading, if dense as all hell, and both gave me some really delightful epiphanies.
If Leonardo da Vinci had been born a female the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel might never have been painted. And if Michelangelo had been Siamese twins, the work would have been completed in half the time. I’d love to see his reaction now that so many of his predictions have proven false a topic not touched on in the 20th anniversary intro.
In the first type, theorems are generated from the rules within the system. The first one is cursive, in which the ground is only a by product or negative space of the figure, and is of less importance than the figure. In general, I think that the author should have used, in this instance, more examples and terminology from computational theory; this would have improved the conciseness, conceptual clarity and rigour of the exposition.
Godel, Escher, Bach : Douglas R. Hofstadter :
You walk away, and hocstadter stay away for a while. This seems to be saying that the most important part of the messaging process is the recognition or consciousness part.
Hofstadter Original Review, Before we ask “Are dolphins intelligent? But there are around a hundred billion neurons in a human brain and the structure quickly becomes preposterously complicated – groups of groups of groups of neurons, all acting in interconnected ways to produce conscious thought.
As it is, his constant pedagogical wordplay and artful brain teasers started out fun but after page they started making me tired. Oct 07, Forrest rated it it was amazing. The infinitude of the real numbers never ceases to blow me away.
The whole thing is a massive and I do mean that literally waste of time, though since it does gode, a knack for making dumb people feel smart, it will undoubtedly appeal to the xkcd crowd. No matter how many new branches you form on the trees, no matter how small they might be, there will always be some unreachable truth. We find a painfully obsolete statement by the author that reflects his deep skepticism about the capability of a computer program to ever achieve world-champion-level skills in chess-playing.
Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid by Douglas R. Hofstadter
GEB presents varying ways of explaining about systems and levels that create these self-referential infinite loops. Retrieved from ” https: So, for my next visit to a desert island, give me sun, sand, water and GEB, and I’ll live happily ever after.
How many of those integer guys are running around again? They’re tedious and beat around the bush and make what should dougkas one paragraph into several pages.
I don’t know bacch mathematicians feel like they have to write like it’s There are 10 kinds of people in the world.
Hofstadter shows you the machine, takes it to pieces, and then puts it back together again and runs the engine. Jun 27, Rob rated it it was amazing Recommends it for: Is that a true statement? The preceding picture by Escher demonstrates another key point of the book, to wit: It depends on hofstadtdr you consume heavily …more I think it’s fun.
Gödel, Escher, Bach: An Eternal Golden Braid
Author and character become democratic equals providing characters with the metaphysical ladder up which they may escape this terrible mess the author has tried to create. And before you know it, you really have come to the end of your journey together. And personally, I think it’s something that writers on ‘intellectual’ subjects should strive for more often.
Douglas attended the International School of Geneva for a year. In fact, it bordered on feeling smug and obnoxious more often than not.
Godel, Escher, Bach : An Eternal Golden Braid
They can not imagine the world any other way. You can’t just differ with the masses in not hating mathematics I could not with a clear conscience recommend this book to everyone, because I’m simply not that cruel. The above image knocked This book was so metal. I deeply disagree with this perspective — in my view, while these theorems dispel any naive pretension for a century-like a-la Hodstadter finitistic and absolute achievement of simultaneous consistency and completeness, on the other hand we must bear in mind that: You just can’t get over how lovely she is, how funny, how brilliant Return to Book Page.